Invisible wrote:
> http://www.valvesoftware.com/publications/2010/siggraph2010_vlachos_waterflow.pdf 
> 
> 
> Significantly less impressive than you'd think. Check out page #3, for 
> example. It appears to be merely a trivial repeating texture.

It *is* a trivial repeating texture, when static. See page 9.

> There's no 
> hint of all the complexity that the paper claims goes into generating 
> this...

Probably because it's not animated, and thus a dynamic flow of water isn't 
going to be obvious in a printed paper.

Thanks for the paper, tho. That's interesting.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
  "How did he die?"   "He got shot in the hand."
     "That was fatal?"
          "He was holding a live grenade at the time."

Post a reply to this message