On 04/02/2011 06:21 AM, Darren New wrote:
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> If you don't mind administrating your own site entirely, and having it
>> on a virtual machine, some people are using this:
>
> Yeah, Amazon has a lot more services than their S3 storage server, but
> there's a lot of competition that is cheaper than Amazon's rates on
> compute time. Amazon has a bunch of different storage and CDN and
> hosting and database solutions too, but if you're just looking for plain
> old cycles, you can get it cheaper than amazon these days. Their raw
> storage, however, is super cheap. Like, $0.15/gig/month or some such.

I have yet to find a virtual server offering that I could even plausibly 
afford. The cheapest I've seen is, like, £15/month, which is way more 
than I want to pay. Any suggestions?

Post a reply to this message