|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:23:59 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> It's entirely possible to be logical using the internal logic (which in
>> many religions has some degree of consistency) and have a rational
>> discussion.
>>
> Hmm. And here we where recently arguing over whether or not "string
> theory", which has "some degree of internal consistency", constituted a
> valid description of *anything* at all...
I don't believe I was involved in that discussion. I certainly don't
know a lot about string theory, and not nearly enough to compare a
religion to it.
That is just a ludicrous statement/challenge.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |