On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:23:59 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:

>> It's entirely possible to be logical using the internal logic (which in
>> many religions has some degree of consistency) and have a rational
>> discussion.
>>
> Hmm. And here we where recently arguing over whether or not "string
> theory", which has "some degree of internal consistency", constituted a
> valid description of *anything* at all...

I don't believe I was involved in that discussion.  I certainly don't 
know a lot about string theory, and not nearly enough to compare a 
religion to it.

That is just a ludicrous statement/challenge.

Jim

Post a reply to this message