|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:13:10 -0800, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I think it could be legally argued that since the technology didn't
>> erase- upon-playback that it was implied that the content might/could
>> be viewed more than once.
>
> Um, it's Sony's device playing back, not the copyright holder's device.
> The fact that Sony didn't make it erase doesn't allow Sony to make
> copies of someone *else's* video.
But the question was about watching a time-shifted programme more than
once...
At least that was what I understood the question to be. Was I wrong?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |