On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:13:10 -0800, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I think it could be legally argued that since the technology didn't
>> erase- upon-playback that it was implied that the content might/could
>> be viewed more than once.
> 
> Um, it's Sony's device playing back, not the copyright holder's device.
> The fact that Sony didn't make it erase doesn't allow Sony to make
> copies of someone *else's* video.

But the question was about watching a time-shifted programme more than 
once...

At least that was what I understood the question to be.  Was I wrong?

Jim

Post a reply to this message