|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 25/01/2011 06:28 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> OK, so you can change the frequency weightings and how often a
>> keyframe is put in, and so forth. I'm not seeing much that
>> fundamentally changes the whole algorithm such that it might require
>> less computer power.
>
> Making every frame a keyframe reduces the computing and memory you need.
Presumably the bitrate is going to skyrocket if you do that though.
> Not doing motion prediction reduces how much compute power you need.
Does the standard actually allow that?
(Now that I think about it, the decoder algorithm is usually far more
tightly specified than the encoder...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |