|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> The technical term for that is a 'hidden variable theory'; the variable
> has a value except we don't know it. Bell has shown that if the universe
> can be described by a hidden variable theory some measurable quantities
> have different values than if the variable has no value until measured.
> Alain Aspect has shown that nature is incompatible with a hidden
> variable theory. So Darren is right, and you, Einstein, Podolsky, and
> Rosen are proven wrong. Nothing to be ashamed of, I'd say.
Does that prove that there is nothing "running" our universe - ie it's
not some computer simulation inside another far more complex universe?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |