Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:06:52 -0500, Warp wrote:

> > Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:01:50 -0500, Warp wrote:
> > 
> >> > Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> >> >> I fail to see how telling
> >> >> people "if you believe in something, practice it" comes even close
> >> >> to establishing a state-sponsored religion
> >> > 
> >> >   For fair balance, shouldn't there be a "Nation Day of Atheism"? You
> >> >   can
> >> > make the exact same arguments: It's not promoting atheism nor forcing
> >> > anybody to be atheist. You can be atheist if you want, but it's your
> >> > choice.
> > 
> >> Actually, there is one - and it's usually (now) held on the same day as
> >> the NDP IIRC.
> > 
> >   Mandated by your congress, announced by your president?
> > 
> >   Yeah, exactly the same thing, really.

> Like I sorta said earlier, talking with you is often like talking to a 
> brick wall.  It's all black-and-white to you, isn't it?

  I understand that reply to mean that no, your so-called "atheism day"
is not official, mandated by your congress. That's my point. There's a
definite bias.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message