|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 13/01/2011 02:51 PM, Invisible wrote:
> Specifically, if the probability of catching the diabolo is P, then the
> probability of *not* catching it must be 1-P. Apparently the probability
> of K successes followed by one failure is
>
> Prob K = P^K * (1-P)
If P is the probability of an event happening, than P^K is the
probability of it happening K times, and 1-P is the probability of it
not happening once. Hence the above formula.
I tried plotting it:
http://tinyurl.com/6bsfnol
As you'd expect, as the catch probability goes up, the probability of
longer chain lengths increases sharply.
Paradoxically, as P becomes very close to 100%, 1-P obviously becomes
extremely close to zero. In other words, /every/ chain length becomes
very unlikely.
If we look not at chains of length K but chains of length /at least/ K,
we get Prob K = P^K. Plotting this:
http://tinyurl.com/5wlkdmf
we discover that indeed, as P increases, the typical chain lengths
increase very sharply. (If Wolfram had bothered to label their axies, I
might even be able to tell you what the probability of 50 catches is. :-P )
> All of this of course assumes that the trails are *independent*, which
> they manifestly are not...
I have no idea how to account for that mathematically, however.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |