>>>> but maybe that's just because we haven't figured out yet what is
>>>> driving those events, so they just *appear* random to us.
>>>
>>> FWIW, the answer to this speculation is "no, we have proven that's not
>>> the case." :-)
>>
>> Really? How?
>
> Look up "Bell's Inequality." It has recently (in the last couple of
> years) gone on from there to prove that the problem is not non-local
> interactions.

But does that really prove that there is nothing else controlling what 
we are measuring?  If you liken our universe to a computer simulation, 
then outside of the simulation none of the limitations inside the 
simulation necessarily apply.

Post a reply to this message