scott wrote:
>>> but maybe that's just because we haven't figured out yet what is
>>> driving those events, so they just *appear* random to us.
>>
>> FWIW, the answer to this speculation is "no, we have proven that's not
>> the case." :-)
> 
> Really?  How?

Look up "Bell's Inequality."  It has recently (in the last couple of years) 
gone on from there to prove that the problem is not non-local interactions.

Yeah, it was pretty surprising to me too.

There are lots of explanations out there, but here's one I found was very 
clear: http://phys.wordpress.com/bells-theorem/

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message