Warp wrote:
> he willingly broke the first amendment with
> complete disregard of the ruling.

Yep. Just like the last 60 years or so. :-) Plus, of course, the judge said 
"I think it's unconstitutional, but let's push it all the way up before we 
actually prohibit it." So he didn't break the law. He broke the law as 
interpreted by one judge who admitted her interpretation might not be correct.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message