> Right. If you accept that our universe is a computer simulation and that
> ID's "designer" is outside out universe, then the theory becomes at
> least logically plausible. (And still not testable.)
>
> That's *a lot* of assumptions just to avoid accepting the vast amount of
> evidence supporting evolution.

If our universe is a kind of computer simulation, that doesn't mean 
evolution didn't or couldn't have happened.  It just means someone or 
something set up the "rules" and the "initial conditions".

Post a reply to this message