|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> But.. This only seems to be the case, isn't certain,
It's as certain as anything. There's actually experimental evidence that
it's not only unknowable, but actually random. We *know* it's not just a
limitation in our knowledge or what we're measuring, but that the
measurements really aren't even there until we look.
> and its not so
> random you can't create conditions where one result is **way** more
> probable than another.
Only statistically. For any given single interaction, the probability is
always the same. In QED, that's called "charge".
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |