Patrick Elliott wrote:
> But.. This only seems to be the case, isn't certain,

It's as certain as anything. There's actually experimental evidence that 
it's not only unknowable, but actually random. We *know* it's not just a 
limitation in our knowledge or what we're measuring, but that the 
measurements really aren't even there until we look.

 > and its not so
> random you can't create conditions where one result is **way** more 
> probable than another.

Only statistically. For any given single interaction, the probability is 
always the same.  In QED, that's called "charge".

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message