|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
>>> Be that as it may, I am against the teaching of life's origins on the
>>> public dime, because it is a matter of public debate,
>
>> No it's not.
>
> Just read a funny anecdote of what happens when things are considered
> "a matter of public debate":
Good story. However, even *if* it used to be a matter of public debate, the
debate has occurred in public as specified by the laws of our country, and
the result has been obtained that ID is a thinly-veiled attempt to introduce
religion into the science class, which is also illegal in this country.
Just like it's a matter of public debate whether Fred should go to jail or
not, right up until the jury comes back with a verdict.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |