Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>> Be that as it may, I am against the teaching of life's origins on the 
>>> public dime, because it is a matter of public debate,
> 
>> No it's not.
> 
>   Just read a funny anecdote of what happens when things are considered
> "a matter of public debate":

Good story. However, even *if* it used to be a matter of public debate, the 
debate has occurred in public as specified by the laws of our country, and 
the result has been obtained that ID is a thinly-veiled attempt to introduce 
religion into the science class, which is also illegal in this country.

Just like it's a matter of public debate whether Fred should go to jail or 
not, right up until the jury comes back with a verdict.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message