Patrick Elliott wrote:
> if the universe isn't logically consistent than science 
> would have to be wrong on a huge scale,

I don't think so.

> You would need to.. have an inconsistent universe, which 
> never the less, managed to be consistent on the large scale only. Like.. 
> statistically stable, but completely unstable on the basic level.

We have that already. It's called quantum mechanics. :-)

> Mind, this wouldn't preclude it being consistent, it would only mean 
> that events where not predictable on the smallest scale, but that the 
> law of averages/big numbers both made it consistent once you had enough 
> events to look at.

Again. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message