|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> The only problem with that is, it would have to only be non-logically
> consistent on a very small scale, since, otherwise, there is no evidence
> this would be the case. It also runs into the whole mess that *no* one,
> neither scientists, nor the religious (who love this argument as an "in"
> for their "faith"), would have any damn clue what is going on.
I'd love to address your points, if I could understand what you're saying.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |