Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Invisible wrote:
>>> And it's /still/ not science. You know why? No testable predictions. Not 
>>> a single damned one. There is no possible experiment, even 
>>> hypothetically, which would prove or disprove string theory. 
> 
>> This is no longer true.
> 
>   Can you mention some predictions and tests of string theory?

GIYF.  I can't follow the math, but
http://www.universetoday.com/72531/scientists-say-they-can-now-test-string-theory/

http://www.physorg.com/news88786651.html

http://www.physorg.com/news202553083.html

Googling "string theory test" brings up a bunch, but I haven't looked at 
many of them. Indeed, I myself thought it was a fundamental attribute of 
string theory that it could describe every possible set of physical laws, or 
some such.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message