Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> >   I read something interesting about the so-called Graham's number.

> I had known it was large, but I never really appreciated how large before. Wow.

  Amusingly, the currently-known lower bound for that problem (for which
the Graham number is the upper bound) is 13.

  Quite a range.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message