POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Wolfram's rule 110 bit : Re: Wolfram's rule 110 bit Server Time
3 Sep 2024 13:11:02 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Wolfram's rule 110 bit  
From: clipka
Date: 4 Jan 2011 11:35:31
Message: <4d234c53@news.povray.org>
Am 23.12.2010 00:07, schrieb Darren New:

> Ha! I knew there was a reason I thought the argument that Rule 110 was
> turing complete was a bit flakey. Initializing an infinite tape for a
> turing machine at least makes it more powerful than one with an
> uninitialized tape. And rule 110 needs an infinitely initialized tape.

That's not a problem in cellular automata, as they - by definition - 
have an infinitely initialized "tape" (or, rather, grid of cells).

Also note that rule 110 was proven to be /Turing complete/, not /Turing 
equivalent/.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.