Warp wrote:
> Does that somehow invalidate what I'm saying?

Yes.  At least in the context of this conversation.

You're arguing that we don't need reverse-discrimination laws (aka 
affirmative action) because of what you believe. Yet you also acknowledge 
that what you believe isn't common. If what you believed was common, we 
wouldn't need anti-discrimination laws in the first place, let alone 
reverse-discrimination laws.

>> Is it age discrimination to outlaw adults having sex with prepubescents? If 
>> not, why not?
> 
>   You might as well ask if it's discrimination to outlaw people from stealing
> and murdering.

 From that, you seem to think it is *not* age discrimination?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message