|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Does that somehow invalidate what I'm saying?
Yes. At least in the context of this conversation.
You're arguing that we don't need reverse-discrimination laws (aka
affirmative action) because of what you believe. Yet you also acknowledge
that what you believe isn't common. If what you believed was common, we
wouldn't need anti-discrimination laws in the first place, let alone
reverse-discrimination laws.
>> Is it age discrimination to outlaw adults having sex with prepubescents? If
>> not, why not?
>
> You might as well ask if it's discrimination to outlaw people from stealing
> and murdering.
From that, you seem to think it is *not* age discrimination?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |