|
|
>"Le_Forgeron" schreef in bericht news:4d0d02fc@news.povray.org...
>
>Le 16/12/2010 23:01, Jaap Frank nous fit lire :
>
>> In the poly 16 file there was one parenthesis evaporated in line 318.
>> In this file it is corrected, so overwrite it with this one. Le_Forgeron
>> is changing the allowed maxpower, so I hope we can use the file
>> in the future.
>>
>> Jaap Frank
>
>I rendered the poly 16... part of it are noisy. I need to probably to
>adjust some settings in the solver & poly code (if it can fix something
>at all)
I'm curious, is the central line along the y-axis disappeared?
If it is still there, then the fact that C = 0 may be the answer to that.
Maybe it is not possible to solve very high powers with the poly solver
correctly and you get a bit fuzzy answers.
I've find an other derivation leaving to poly 12, but the result
was not what I wanted, but it rendered well. Interested?
>To ease the input, I'm adding a new syntax (no more ordering, you can
>omit the coefficient at 0, it save a bit !)
>
>#declare Spiral_Shape = object { polynom { 8
>/* x^8 */ xyz(8,0,0): 1
>/* x^6.y^2 */ xyz(6,2,0): 2*T2
>/* x^6.z^2 */ xyz(6,0,2): 4
>/* x^6 */ xyz(6,0,0): -2*((1-P2*T2)*R2+A2)
>/* x^5.y */ xyz(5,1,0): -8*R2*Slope*T2
>/* x^4.y^4 */ xyz(4,4,0): T2*T2
>/* x^4.y^2.z^2 */ xyz(4,2,2): 6*T2
>/* x^4.y^2 */ xyz(4,2,0): 2*T2*((1-P2*T2)*R2-A2)
>/* x^4.z^4 */ xyz(4,0,4): 6
>/* x^4.z^2 */ xyz(4,0,2): -2*((3-2*P2*T2)*R2+3*A2)
>/* x^2.y^2.z^4 */ xyz(2,2,4): 6*T2
>/* x^2.y^2.z^2 */ xyz(2,2,2): 2*T2*((2-P2*T2)*R2-2*A2)
>/* x^2.z^6 */ xyz(2,0,6): 4
>/* x^2.z^4 */ xyz(2,0,4): -2*((3-P2*T2)*R2+3*A2)
>/* x^2.z^2 */ xyz(2,0,2): 2*(R2-A2)*((1+P2*T2)*R2-A2)
>/* x.y.z^4 */ xyz(1,1,4): -8*R2*Slope*T2
>/* y^4.z^4 */ xyz(0,4,4): T2*T2
>/* y^2.z^6 */ xyz(0,2,6): 2*T2
>/* y^2.z^4 */ xyz(0,2,4): 2*T2*(R2-A2)
>/* z^8 */ xyz(0,0,8): 1
>/* z^6 */ xyz(0,0,6): -2*(R2+A2)
>/* z^4 */ xyz(0,0,4): (R2-A2)*(R2-A2)
>/* C */ xyz(0,0,0): 0.000000001 sturm }
>// end poly
>} // end object
Splendid, that's far more easier! It makes the file better to read.
Do you start with all zero's and put the given factors in
their correct position? I expect something like that will
be the way to do that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|