On 16/12/2010 5:35 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> On 16/12/2010 4:12 PM, Darren New wrote:
>>> Needs more professional voice-over,
>>
>> I thought that the voice was fine.
>
> Well, the recording itself could be better. Less gasping breathing,
> don't overload the microphone, etc. It wasn't the voice so much as the
> fact that he bobbled a few sentences that if it were a professional
> video would have been re-recorded. The voice wasn't unpleasant. The
> performance was excellent for a youtube video, but wouldn't stand for
> (say) a television documentary.
>
> Bobbled at 3m04s, bad breath break at 3m24s, bobbled at 3m37s, etc.
> Something that you'd certainly never worry about if you were listening
> to someone live (or free). Basically, he's trying to read and perform at
> the same time, not always reading far enough ahead to know where the
> "verbal commas" go, which professionals get around by only recording a
> handful of sentences at a time.
>
> Since I don't know why Neeum is asking, I'm pointing out trivial stuff
> as well as any of the bigger things I notice.
>

I liked his tone and his accent.
I did not listen to the content.


-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message