Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> Similarly, anything excessively cryptic, bizare and/or pointless 
>> qualifies as "modern art".
> 
>   That means Haskell qualifies as modern art.

Bazinga!

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message