|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> I have hard time believing that.
It's just what I've heard. Maybe you wouldn't notice the tides if you didn't
look out the window, is what they meant. (I think I heard it from Sagan or
Asimov or something like that.)
Your argument is good, tho. Thinking on it, I can't imagine how you wouldn't
notice. :-)
> However, this horizon is caused by the expansion of the Universe, not
> by gravity, and it's always relative to where the observer is to begin
> with.
I was talking about overall. (You may be taking me too seriously. :-)
>> I think it was more popular before people found dark energy and thought we
>> were heading for a "big crunch" or something?
>
> I think the word "found" is wrong here. It hasn't been measured; it's a
> hypothesis. (It could perfectly well be the *correct* hypothesis, but until
> it's measured it's just that.)
For "found" read "found the affects attributed to..."
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |