Warp wrote:
> These are the same people who will not bother fixing their broken
> C preprocessor even though they know it's broken (they have officially
> stated that they won't fix it anytime soon).
BTW, I don't think it's likely a matter of "won't bother" as much as it is
"have decided backwards-bug-compatibility is more important to our business
than being correct." There are a fair number of bugs in various MS products
that don't get fixed because people are depending upon the buggy behavior.
Remind me again what the problem is?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|