Warp wrote:
>   These are the same people who will not bother fixing their broken
> C preprocessor even though they know it's broken (they have officially
> stated that they won't fix it anytime soon).

BTW, I don't think it's likely a matter of "won't bother" as much as it is 
"have decided backwards-bug-compatibility is more important to our business 
than being correct."  There are a fair number of bugs in various MS products 
that don't get fixed because people are depending upon the buggy behavior.

Remind me again what the problem is?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message