|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I.e., bunches of people don't know the difference between "abstract data
> type" and "abstract class". And then I think *you* told me "no, an
> abstract data type is a class without implementations, and an algebraic
> data type is what you think you're calling an abstract data type."
>
> Clearly I misunderstood what you were telling me.
I'd be rather surprised if that's what I said, given that I have no clue
what the hell an abstract data type actually is.
(I remember the Eiffel book mentions them. And I remember the concept
not making much sense...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |