|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> Darren New escreveu:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_data_type
>>
>> ADT is abstract data type, which is *not* "an opaque object" in the
>> object-oriented programming sense.
>
> it's opaque if you don't mess with it directly.
Yes, but it's not an ADT just because it's opaque. That's what lots of
people thought the definition of ADT was a couple years ago. Good to see the
right answer is picking up.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |