nemesis wrote:
> Darren New escreveu:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_data_type
>>
>> ADT is abstract data type, which is *not* "an opaque object" in the 
>> object-oriented programming sense.
> 
> it's opaque if you don't mess with it directly. 

Yes, but it's not an ADT just because it's opaque. That's what lots of 
people thought the definition of ADT was a couple years ago. Good to see the 
right answer is picking up.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message