|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> I don't know what "abstract class" means in other languages,
That's pretty standard terminology, yes.
I see that over the last couple of years, Google has pushed the correct
definition of "abstract data type" up to the top, which is good.
Example incorrect definitions:
http://www.desy.de/gna/html/cc/Tutorial/node4.html
http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=abstract+data+type&i=37349,00.asp
http://www.allinterview.com/showanswers/10639.html
It used to be the top two or three pages of google hits were all pointing to
notes in university lectures that basically confused "abstract data type"
with "object-oriented data abstraction".
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |