Le 19/10/2010 11:39, Christian Froeschlin nous fit lire :

> I suspect the reason has to do with crackle cache hits dropping
> from 99% to 20% so it probably bloats some internal data structure,
> but it seems strange that freeing that would take so much longer
> than building it in the first place. Maybe a case of O(n*n)? ;)
> 
> Tested on Win 7 64-bit with 3.7 beta 39 on an i7-970.

Cannot reproduce on Linux 64-bits with 3.7 beta 39+@(#5167) on i7 too.
Even with scale 0.002 and 6400x4800 with AA 0.004, just a slow down to
compress the file.

Are you sure your MS-Win is fresh enough (swap/gui handle/what else) ?
Enough free mem ?

Post a reply to this message