|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > I assume that means that Haskell doesn't handle objects (if it even has
> > such a concept) by value, only by reference (which, in fact, isn't very
> > surprising to me).
> Semantically, this is a rather difficult question to answer for a purely
> functional language where the data can't be mutated.
Well, if eg. integers can be handled by value, why not user-defined
objects?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |