Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> >   I assume that means that Haskell doesn't handle objects (if it even has
> > such a concept) by value, only by reference (which, in fact, isn't very
> > surprising to me).

> Semantically, this is a rather difficult question to answer for a purely 
> functional language where the data can't be mutated.

  Well, if eg. integers can be handled by value, why not user-defined
objects?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message