Warp wrote:
>   I assume that means that Haskell doesn't handle objects (if it even has
> such a concept) by value, only by reference (which, in fact, isn't very
> surprising to me).

Semantically, this is a rather difficult question to answer for a purely 
functional language where the data can't be mutated.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Serving Suggestion:
     "Don't serve this any more. It's awful."

Post a reply to this message