|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> I assume that means that Haskell doesn't handle objects (if it even has
> such a concept) by value, only by reference (which, in fact, isn't very
> surprising to me).
Semantically, this is a rather difficult question to answer for a purely
functional language where the data can't be mutated.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |