nemesis wrote:
> Invisible escreveu:
>>> You are assuming that there are no documents that crash in OO while
>>> opening nicely in Word. Unless you can show that such cases do not exist
>>> I will simply assume that both implementations are independent and have
>>> a (hopefully) disjunct set of bugs.
>> 
>> Dang. If only OpenOffice had been implemented in a programming language
>> which facilitates operational proofs...
> 
> nothing prevents you from writing a static analyzer for java code and
> work on from there... :p

Ugh, why do so many people insist OpenOffice is written in Java, and 
continue spreading the myth?

It's not Java, it's C++. Specifically, ugly C++ with way too many 
abbreviations in function names, and lots of comments in German.

Post a reply to this message