On 21/09/2010 08:54 PM, Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v8<voi### [at] devnull>  wrote:
>> I'm not arguing that vector graphics isn't useful. I'm arguing that it's
>> not useful *for photographs*.
>
>    Who ever suggested it to be used for photographs?

The page that linked to this image. They made it sound like "and even 
better, there's plenty of programs to convert all your JPEG and PNG 
images to SVG", like it's just another image format.

>    I got the impression that the purpose of the SVG was to show an artistic
> impression of the image (like if it was painted).

If that's your goal, then sure, that could work. It probably requires 
more effort than just an automatic trace program though.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message