Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> I'm not arguing that vector graphics isn't useful. I'm arguing that it's
> not useful *for photographs*.
Who ever suggested it to be used for photographs?
> But for a photograph... well, see for yourself. The image quality is
> nowhere near what the original photograph was, and that's *before* you
> try to change size...
I got the impression that the purpose of the SVG was to show an artistic
impression of the image (like if it was painted).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|