Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> I'm not arguing that vector graphics isn't useful. I'm arguing that it's 
> not useful *for photographs*.

  Who ever suggested it to be used for photographs?

> But for a photograph... well, see for yourself. The image quality is 
> nowhere near what the original photograph was, and that's *before* you 
> try to change size...

  I got the impression that the purpose of the SVG was to show an artistic
impression of the image (like if it was painted).

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message