Orchid XP v8 escreveu:
> Oh, right. I was planning to use JS to expand and collapse the tree, not 
> to actually *generate* it.
> 
>>> So... you transform the page on the client-side? Why in the name of 
>>> God would you do that?
>>
>> so you don't need to waste bandwidth?
> 
> Not really relevant here.
> 
> If you generate a static page, then if JS is unavailable for some 
> reason, the tree itself will at least display.

I was thinking you were planning to generate a new tree server-side 
everytime the user wanted to expand/collapse the tree.

You indeed can generate the tree server-side.  What's the problem with 
nested ul's again?

-- 
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9

Post a reply to this message