Invisible wrote:
> Or rather, it makes perfect sense in that if it's open to 
> interpretation, you can interpret it in whatever way is most beneficial 
> to you. :-/

I don't know about the UK, but the rule in the USA is that if the contract 
is ambiguous, it gets read in a way that goes against the person who wrote 
the contract or brought the lawsuit. So, no.

Indeed, I've seen law cases where an extra comment separated two things the 
author wanted bound together and cost millions of dollars.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
    Quoth the raven:
        Need S'Mores!

Post a reply to this message