On 08/14/2010 06:14 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 08/14/2010 01:38 AM, SharkD wrote:
>> On 8/13/2010 5:43 AM, clipka wrote:
>>> Strictly speaking, assumed_gamma affects none of these. The only effect
>>> it has is on the output image (which is why the approach is inadequate,
>>> and assumed_gamma is deprecated again as of version 3.7).
>>>
>>> In this sense, it does indeed affect any and all effects, including
>>> those generated with filter and/or transmit.
>>
>> Any way to fix the scene? I get the same broken results in 3.7 as I do
>> in 3.6.2 with assumed_gamma set to 1.
>>
>>
> IIRC ... using radiosity was the culprit. Could be thinking of something
> else, but I suppose turning off rad (if you're using it) is worth a shot.

Sheesh ... the more I thought about this, the more it just sounded plain
stupid ... or maybe "Dazed and Confused" (digs out Led Zeppelin CD to
clears out the cobwebs) ... after looking through some old crib notes
seems like I was thinking of "NKFlare" and media :-!

Post a reply to this message