|
|
Am 09.08.2010 14:36, schrieb davidafisher:
> But this is where I'm missing something. Wouldn't both these actions, the matrix
> shearing and the rotate with scaling, result in a parallelogram and not a
> rhomboid?
(A) A rhomboid, in traditionally 2D geometry, /is/ a parallelogram.
(B) A rhomboid, in contemporary 3D geometry, aka parallelepiped, /is/
the 3D analogon to a parallelogram.
Post a reply to this message
|
|