|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] u washington edu> wrote:
> I'm sure you've already heard about this if you've been anywhere near
> the internet today, but there's apparently a new claim at a proof of
> P!=NP which at least looks pretty worth taking seriously:
> http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP/Deolalikar.pdf
> It'll be interesting to hear what people have to say about it as they
> have time to review it in detail. At worst case, it seems there'll be
> an interesting failure at a proof, which is still something sort of cool
> IMHO.
If the proof results to be correct, I think a *lot* of people out there
are going to sigh in relief (because an enormous amount of math and
practical computer code out there rely on the assumption that P != NP).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |