On 08/07/2010 05:09 PM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 07/08/2010 17:27, Jim Holsenback nous fit lire :
>> this has been confirmed on ubuntu 10.4 and openSuSe 11.2 (assuming 32
>> bit version) as openSuSe 11.2 64-bit reports no problem
>>
> 
>> before going too much further i was wondering if anyone has done a
>> source build against the 8b version of libjpeg ... 
> 
> 
> Source built of beta38 is against libjpeg62 on my ubuntu 10.4 (amd64);

are you seeing the problem ... just use +ua +fj
clipka didn't see it on his opensuse 11.2 (64), but chris cason did on
ubuntu 10.4 (32), and so did i on opensuse 11.2 (32)

> Any suggesttion where to find 8b ? (a launchpad experiment ? or only on
> x86 ? somewhere else ?)

http://www.ijg.org/

> 
> Please notice that the beta source only provide beta35, a post provide
> beta38. No official 39 so far for source.
> 

yikes ... you are correct ... sorry about that (it's certainly a luxury
to have access to the code repository) i don't think this was introduced
with the b39 release (but i could be wrong) discovered it while doing a
doc entry ... testing if a non supported format (picked jpeg) would
throw a warning if +ua was specified. if you're willing to give it a go
that might be helpful in seeing if there is any other fall out from
using v8b libjpeg. i was going to give it a day or too and see if anyone
had even attempted ANY beta build using v8b. it seems to me that subject
was briefly mentioned in another thread before ... but darned if i can
find it.

Post a reply to this message