On 7/30/2010 2:22 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:10:39 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>
>> Man are you clueless.
>
> Nice way to carry on a conversation, Patrick - start with argumentum ad
> hominem.  I'm outta here.
>
> Jim
Sorry, was a bit... excessive. But I see a lot of parallels in this 
argument with a whole host of other issues, and imho, I think the logic 
works almost as poorly with this one as with all of the rest of them. As 
such, I may be getting a bit.. frustrated at seeing it repeated, along 
with the non-solutions, and assumptions about what actually is being 
done, even when most of it is ineffective, undermined, or bait and 
switch politics, almost verbatim, with only a few word changes, specific 
to the situation under discussion. I would love a real discussion on 
what solutions "need" to be implemented, but, "throw out all the rules", 
isn't any more of one than, "keep things they way they are". And things 
only getting muddier when you try to find any sort of effective middle 
ground. If I falsely perceived a similar trend in this conversation, and 
reacted poorly (at least for here), I apologize.

-- 
void main () {
   If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message