Chris Cason wrote:
> We could I suppose have a "fast_macro" keyword which is explicitly defined
> as being cached in memory. But none of us have the time to write this ATM.
Something like that would be great, mainly if you could mark *any* macro
as being a fast_macro, so that official macros could be used in this
manner without editing the includes files they come from.
Post a reply to this message
|