Darren New wrote:
> It was funny, tho. I read someone talking about all the "nosql"
> databases, and how people were complaining SQL doesn't "scale". He said
> "SQL scales fine. What the people mean is that SQL doesn't scale if you
> want to use a commodity piece of hardware like Amazon rents. This is
> what we have in my office for testing:" and gives the stats on a 96-CPU
> 256G RAM SQL processor. He says "That's the low-end base machine for
> testing, not the production system."
Presumably that's not x86 though.
Post a reply to this message
|