"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message 
news:web.4c35c2cf80efe655caa39c860@news.povray.org...
>I keep e-mailing myself things I made in my lunch break to post here when I 
>get
> home, and then I get home and don't switch the PC on... :-/ So I'm posting 
> via
> the web interface in my lunch break instead*.
>
> Anyway, here's a couple of isosurfaces I came up with recently. Both are 
> very
> slow, but quite pretty (IMO).
>
> The reinforced concrete is an inverse isosurface, differerenced with a 
> block. I
> wanted to see if I could carve a realistic decay into an object without 
> needing
> the shape of the object itself to be an isosurface.
>
> The other picture is a substance I've christened Greebelium :) It's a
> multi-fractal based on crackle metric 1 (3 octaves, scale and amplitude 
> reduced
> by 1/4 with each octave).
>
> What do you think?
> Anyone want source with that?
>
> --
> Tek
> http://evilsuperbrain.com
>
> *Grammar fail, my lunch break has a web interface?
>

Amazing!  That first image is brilliant, I'd love to take a look at the 
source please please pretty please :)

Cheers Dre

Post a reply to this message