|
|
scott wrote:
>> .....1,549,498,368
>
> I recognise those last 6 digits! I think I got them from my program,
> but then my method was too slow to do any more digits in reasonable time.
>
It's interesting that you had an algorithm that could compute six digits
but not ten. You might try running it on the second version of the
puzzle that I gave, since I only ask for the last five digits in that
case. Maybe it'll work!
Post a reply to this message
|
|