SharkD wrote:

> What's worse are all the "fake" results 
> (e.g. softinformer.com IIRC) where the website has simply strung a 
> series of random strings together but the actual content is only 
> tangentially related at best. Also bad are those sites that simply 
> reproduce content from elsewhere such as Wikipedia or Usenet, resulting 
> in lots of duplicate "hits".

Oh man, I hate that so much!

It's much, much worse if you do a search for anything related to 
Microsoft products. You get 80,000,000 "fix error 01923" results and 
similar - all of which have *nothing* to do with your problem. (Most of 
them are in fact sites to peddle expensive trojans, obviously.)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message