|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
SharkD wrote:
> What's worse are all the "fake" results
> (e.g. softinformer.com IIRC) where the website has simply strung a
> series of random strings together but the actual content is only
> tangentially related at best. Also bad are those sites that simply
> reproduce content from elsewhere such as Wikipedia or Usenet, resulting
> in lots of duplicate "hits".
Oh man, I hate that so much!
It's much, much worse if you do a search for anything related to
Microsoft products. You get 80,000,000 "fix error 01923" results and
similar - all of which have *nothing* to do with your problem. (Most of
them are in fact sites to peddle expensive trojans, obviously.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |