|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Phil Cook v2 <phi### [at] nospamrocain freeserve co uk> wrote:
> Scab! Heh. OOC why the Xbox and not the PS3? I'm not fan-boying or
> anything I'm genuinely curious.
Well, the vast majority of games are published for both the Xbox 360 and
the PS3, so there isn't much difference in that section. (There was a rather
big selection of exclusive games for the PS2, but since the PS3 is not
backwards compatible, it's inconsequential.) The Xbox 360 is 100 euros
cheaper than the PS3, which is a significant amount.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |