>> Well just start it at roughly the right time and have the thread loop 
>> until it's exactly the correct time.
>
> I'm not keen on burning shedloads of CPU power just because of a 
> deficiency in the thread library. But we'll see...

Well issue a sleep command at the top until you are roughly at the correct 
time, then loop until you are exactly there.  You shouldn't be burning more 
than 0.1 or 0.2% CPU this way.

Post a reply to this message