Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 6/8/2010 8:16 AM, Invisible wrote:
> 
>> Again, depends how complex. ;-)
> 
> OK, How about this one. Coding x86 Machine Language with no assembler. 
> That's difficult ;)

Hell yes. But that's because the x86 system has become ridiculously 
over-complicated with decades' worth of backwards-compatibility crap. 
(E.g., real-mode exists, even though most desktops spend less than 0.01% 
percent of their time running in this mode.)

Post a reply to this message