scott wrote:
>> Only problem is that first I'd have to find out what the necessary API 
>> calls are. This is highly likely to be quite intractibly difficult.
> 
> It's not *that* hard to use the Windows wave API to repeatedly get a 
> buffer full of samples,

Hey, at least he didn't say it's obviously impossible. :-)

> I thought WAV was quite easy to decode, isn't the data just stored 
> byte-by-byte after some header?

Yes. But the headers tell you important stuff like sample size and samples 
per second and such.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
    Eiffel - The language that lets you specify exactly
    that the code does what you think it does, even if
    it doesn't do what you wanted.

Post a reply to this message